Proactive hypothesis testing
We test specific hypotheses about attacker behaviour against your environment, not just watch dashboards.
Service · Continuous Threat Hunting
We look for what your alerts never fired on
Continuous threat hunting proactively searches your historical telemetry for signs of compromise that never triggered an alert - instead of waiting reactively for a trigger that may never come. It's the difference between assuming you're clean and actually checking.
ProactiveSearch-first, not alert-wait
HistoricalReviews telemetry your alerts already have
Hypothesis-ledTests for specific attacker behaviours
1 contextShares intelligence with AI-SOC & pentest
Step 1 - diagnose
Signs you need active hunting, not just alerting
You've had incidents in the past that went undetected for weeks or months before discovery.
Your compliance framework or insurer expects evidence of proactive threat hunting, not just alerting.
You're not confident your current tools would catch a slow, quiet attacker who avoids tripping alert thresholds.
You've never actually reviewed your own historical logs for signs of compromise - only reacted to what fired.
Step 2 & 3 - quantify, then recommend
What Techsolve delivers
Historical telemetry review
Analysis of logs and telemetry you already generate, looking backward for missed signals.
Dwell-time reduction
Finds threats that would otherwise sit undetected for weeks, shortening exposure windows.
Findings feed AI-SOC & pentest
Anything found here strengthens detection rules and testing priorities across the rest of your stack.
Documented hunt reports
Clear write-ups of what was tested, what was found, and what to do next - not just a clean bill of health.
Compliance evidence
Documented proactive hunting activity to satisfy insurer and framework requirements.
Step 4 & 5 - implement, then oversee
How we work, start to finish
1
DiagnoseWe review what telemetry you currently generate and retain.
2
QuantifyWe identify which attacker behaviours are most relevant to your environment and industry.
3
RecommendA hunt cadence and hypothesis set prioritised by relevance to your risk profile.
4
ImplementHunts run on an agreed schedule, with findings reported clearly either way.
5
OverseeHunt hypotheses evolve as your environment and the threat landscape change.
Frequently asked
Common questions about threat hunting
How is this different from AI-SOC monitoring?
AI-SOC reacts to alerts as they fire. Threat hunting proactively searches for what never triggered an alert at all.
What if you find nothing?
A documented "nothing found" report is still valuable evidence for compliance and insurance purposes - and it's still useful information.
Do we need our own telemetry infrastructure first?
Some log retention is needed - we'll assess what you have during the initial diagnose step and flag any gaps.
How often should hunts run?
Depends on risk profile and industry - we'll recommend a cadence during scoping, not a one-size-fits-all schedule.
Advisory-led · No product pitch
Scope a threat hunting programme
A short call to understand your telemetry and risk profile before recommending anything.