AI risk review
Audits AI systems handling personal data for DPDPA transparency and purpose-limitation compliance.
Service · AI Risk & Awareness Advisory
The human check on your automated security tools
AI risk and awareness advisory reviews how your organisation actually uses AI, tests your team's resilience against AI-generated phishing, and models threats before new AI systems go into production - the layer of human judgement that automated tools alone can't provide.
82.6%Phishing emails now AI-generated
60%Higher click rate on AI-generated vs traditional phishing
70-80%Reduction in successful attacks after phishing training
$5.72MAverage cost of an AI-powered breach
Step 1 - diagnose
Signs you need this now
Your team is adopting AI tools faster than you're tracking what data those tools can access.
You've never run a phishing simulation, or your last one predates the rise of AI-generated phishing.
You're planning to deploy a new AI system and haven't modelled its specific attack surface.
DPDPA's transparency and purpose-limitation requirements apply to AI systems handling personal data, and you haven't reviewed this.
Step 2 & 3 - quantify, then recommend
What Techsolve delivers
AI-generated phishing simulation
Realistic attack simulations that measure and improve employee resilience against modern threats.
Role-based security awareness training
Programmes covering DPDPA obligations, social engineering and incident response, tailored by role.
AI threat modelling
Architecture reviews that identify AI-specific attack surfaces before a system goes live.
Resilience benchmarking
Ongoing measurement of how your team's phishing resilience changes over time, not a one-off test.
The human layer around AI-SOC/pentest
Sits alongside the automated AI-SOC and AI-Pentest tools - the check that keeps them honest.
Step 4 & 5 - implement, then oversee
How we work, start to finish
1
DiagnoseWe inventory current AI tool usage and your team's baseline phishing resilience.
2
QuantifyWe identify where AI risk exposure and human-error risk are highest.
3
RecommendA training and review cadence matched to your actual risk, not a generic annual module.
4
ImplementSimulations, training and threat-modelling reviews run on an agreed schedule.
5
OverseeResilience tracked over time so training investment shows measurable improvement.
Frequently asked
Common questions about AI risk & awareness advisory
Is this the same as the AI-SOC or AI-Pentest services?
No - those are automated tools. This is the human advisory layer: training your people and reviewing your AI systems' risk posture.
How often should phishing simulations run?
We'll recommend a cadence based on your risk profile - typically more frequent than an annual check given how fast AI-generated phishing evolves.
Does this cover our internal AI tool usage, or just phishing?
Both - the AI risk review specifically covers internal AI tool usage and data handling, separate from the phishing/awareness training.
Can this be combined with GRC or DPDPA services?
Yes - the AI risk review directly feeds your DPDPA and GRC evidence base rather than sitting separately.
Advisory-led · No product pitch
Start with an AI risk review
Understand your actual AI exposure and team resilience before deciding what to prioritise.